In partnership with
Hey,
OpenAI shut down Sora on April 26.
The numbers from the WSJ investigation are worth sitting with. Peaked at ~1 million users, collapsed to under 500K. Burned ~$1M/day in compute. Generated $2.1M in lifetime revenue. Killed a $1B Disney partnership; Disney found out less than an hour before the public did.
Six months from "the AI moment" to dead app.
What's interesting isn't that Sora failed. It's what failed — the demo-first, viral-loop, social-app shape of AI. The thing every deck in 2024 was trying to be. Meanwhile, Anthropic was quietly shipping Claude Code to engineers and getting paid for it. The pattern is now too obvious to ignore: the AI tools surviving 2026 don't look viral. They look like B2B SaaS from 2018. They're embedded in workflows nobody screenshots.
This issue is a tour of the boring survivors. Five sections — skim what you need.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔥 TOOL OF THE WEEK — QuillBot
The most-used AI writing tool you never hear hyped. QuillBot sits inside Chrome, Word, and Google Docs and quietly does what most LLMs are bad at: rewording, tightening, and translating tone on existing text without forcing you to start a chat.
Three things to know:
It's the textbook sticky-tool case. While AI writing apps came and went, QuillBot kept its place because it sits inside the workflows people already had. Students, ESL writers, content marketers, agency editors — same pattern: free tier gets you in, then the unlimited paraphraser and longer summarizer make the upgrade obvious. Premium runs $8.33/mo on annual ($99.95/yr) or $19.95 monthly. The 58% annual discount is real.
The suite quietly expanded. Beyond the paraphraser, the same subscription covers an AI Humanizer, an AI Detector, a grammar checker, a plagiarism scanner, and Flow — a long-form writing canvas. None of these would make a viral launch. All of them get used.
It's a survivor for a specific reason. No demo to wow you. No social loop. The unit of work is "I'm already writing this; help me make it sound better." Sora wanted you to leave your workflow and come play. QuillBot waits inside the workflow for you to arrive.
What it's NOT good for: original long-form drafting from a prompt. Claude and ChatGPT still own that surface. QuillBot starts to add value at the point a draft exists.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Learn how to code faster with AI in 5 mins a day
You're spending 40 hours a week writing code that AI could do in 10.
While you're grinding through pull requests, 200k+ engineers at OpenAI, Google & Meta are using AI to ship faster.
How?
The Code newsletter teaches them exactly which AI tools to use and how to use them.
Here's what you get:
AI coding techniques used by top engineers at top companies in just 5 mins a day
Tools and workflows that cut your coding time in half
Tech insights that keep you 6 months ahead
Sign up and get access to the Ultimate Claude code guide to ship 5X faster.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚡ THREE QUICK HITS
ClickUp — the PM tool that survived the AI-PM-tool wave by eating it. Every "AI-native project management" startup of 2024 either died, pivoted, or got acqui-hired. ClickUp added AI Brain on top of the same product millions already used and kept the customers. Free Forever covers most solo work. Unlimited is $7/user/mo annual ($10 monthly) — unlimited storage, Gantt charts, 1,000 automations/month. Business at $12/user/mo annual ($19 monthly) adds advanced automation, workload planning, and SSO. AI Brain is a separate per-member add-on. The whole product is the case study for "boring + AI > flashy + AI."
→ Try ClickUp free
Tidio AI Agent (Lyro) — while voice-gen apps were burning cash, customer-service chatbots have quietly been the most profitable AI product category on the planet. Lyro is Tidio's AI agent — drops into your Shopify or WooCommerce, trains on your help center, resolves ~67% of inbound questions without a human. Pricing is structurally honest: every Tidio account starts with 50 free Lyro conversations (lifetime), then $39/mo for 50/month renewable, scaling up by volume. Or run standalone at $0.50/conversation with no base Tidio plan. Two footnotes: Tidio counts "billable conversations" only when a human replies, and Flows bill per visitor reached. Read the fine print before scaling — but the AI tier is one of the cleanest pay-per-resolution products in the market.
→ Try Tidio Lyro
Wegic — AI website builder. 300K+ sites built across 220+ countries since launch. The interface is chat — describe the site, it generates a draft, you refine through conversation. Starter is $23.90/mo annual (600 credits/mo, removes Wegic branding, 10K visitors/mo, code download). Premium adds custom domains, unlimited visitors, and 2,000 credits/mo — the tier you want if it's a business site. Honest caveat: this is a website builder, not a product platform. Past a certain complexity you'll want Webflow or Framer instead. But if you've been holding off shipping a landing page because the setup hour is the worst hour, this is the tool that removes the setup hour.
→ Try Wegic free
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✍️ PROMPT OF THE WEEK — The Stickiness Audit
Sora's death is a useful excuse to do a personal version of the same audit. Most of us have signed up for ~10 AI tools in the last 90 days. Maybe 3 of them are still open in a tab right now. The other 7 are quietly burning $5–$50 each.
Paste this into Claude or ChatGPT with your actual list:
You're an honest operations coach. Here are the AI tools I've subscribed to or signed up for in the last 90 days: [LIST: tool, plan price, signed up date].
For each one, score it 0–3 on four axes:
1. Used past day 14 — did I actually keep using it after the novelty?
2. Embedded in a workflow — does another tool I use depend on this one, or could I cancel without disruption?
3. Replaceable in 5 minutes — could a free alternative or an existing subscription do 80% of this job?
4. Earned its monthly price — if I had to re-decide today knowing what I know now, would I still pay?
Then group them into three lists: KEEP (12+ points), DOWNGRADE TO FREE (6–11), CANCEL NOW (0–5). For the CANCEL group, tell me the cancellation URL pattern (Settings → Billing → etc.) so I can move through them in one sitting.
Finally, what does my pattern reveal? Am I over-indexed on a category (writing tools, image generators, chatbots) that I should consolidate into one survivor?
Why it works: the audit forces you to answer the question Sora couldn't — did this earn its place past launch week? Most people lose $100–$500/mo to AI tools they signed up for once and never opened. Run this once a quarter. It pays for any newsletter subscription you actually like.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚖️ COMPARE CORNER — Foxit PDF Editor vs Adobe Acrobat
The most boring software category on earth, and the cleanest illustration of this week's thesis. PDFs are not a viral product. Adobe has owned this since the format existed. Foxit has been quietly eating share for two decades by being functionally identical and half the price.
Foxit PDF Editor — $10.99/mo (PDF Editor, ~$96/yr including 20 AI credits/mo and 20GB cloud) or $13.99/mo for PDF Editor+ (mobile + web, 150GB, 150 eSign envelopes/yr, AI Smart Redact). AI Assistant add-on is $49.99/yr for 2,000 credits/mo. Perpetual license still available (~$199–$249 one-time) if you hate subscriptions. ~700M users globally. Microsoft Office-style interface — anyone who's used Word feels at home. Foxit eSign is sold separately if you only need signature workflows without the editor.
Adobe Acrobat — Standard $14.99/mo annual ($26.49/mo monthly billing — 77% markup for monthly), Pro $19.99/mo annual ($29.99/mo monthly — 50% markup). AI Assistant is an extra $4.99/mo or $59.88/yr. Best-in-class OCR, real-time collaboration that actually works, deep Creative Cloud integration. The 4,000+ G2 reviews speak for themselves — it's the standard for a reason.
The honest take: if you're a solo professional, small business, legal/accounting/HR team, or anyone who edits PDFs more than once a week — Foxit at $96/yr vs Adobe's $240/yr is a no-brainer. The feature parity is closer than Adobe's pricing suggests. Adobe still wins for: real-time co-editing on long documents, native Creative Cloud workflows, and the irreplaceable "everyone has Acrobat" institutional default. If you're not editing PDFs every day, Foxit's perpetual license is the most ToolChase-shaped recommendation we'll make this year — pay once, own it, stop renting software.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
100+ Claude Code hacks to ship code 10X faster
Top engineers at Anthropic and OpenAI say AI now writes 100% of their code.
If you're not using AI, you're spending 40 hours doing what they do in 4.
These 100+ Claude Code hacks fix that and help you ship 10x faster.
Sign up for The Code and get:
100+ Claude Code hacks used by top engineers — free
The Code newsletter — learn the latest AI tools, tips, and skills to code faster with AI in 5 minutes a day
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📌 ONE EDITORIAL TAKE
The thing Sora's shutdown crystallizes is that the AI market just finished its launch era.
From late 2022 through 2025, the metric that mattered was installs on day seven. The story was "a million users in five days." Demo videos were the product. Twitter virality predicted funding rounds.
That era is over. The metric that matters now is monthly retention at month six. Anthropic took the AI mindshare crown from OpenAI not by shipping a flashier demo but by shipping software engineers' default coding tool. QuillBot kept its 50M+ users not with a viral moment but by being embedded in the Chrome extension that's been there for four years. ClickUp ate the entire "AI-native PM tool" category by being already-installed when AI showed up. Foxit owns its slice of the most boring software market in tech by being half the price of Adobe and showing up the same way for twenty years.
Two implications for how you pick tools now:
First, watch where the workflow already lives. A tool that adds AI inside Word, Gmail, Chrome, your CRM, your PM tool wins over a tool that asks you to leave those surfaces. The "open a new tab and type a prompt" tools peaked. The "show up where I already am" tools are the survivors.
Second, the demo is now anti-signal. If a tool's marketing is mostly a beautifully-edited launch video, run. If its marketing is mostly use-case docs, integrations lists, and pricing transparency — buy. We're past the era when good demos predicted good products. We're in the era when boring docs predict survival.
The tools in this issue all share one trait: you couldn't film a good launch video for any of them. That's the recommendation.
We track verified pricing, integration depth, and which workflow surfaces every tool plugs into at ToolChase. If you spot a tool that's drifted from sticky to demo-shaped, hit reply.
That's it for this Wednesday.
If you ran the Stickiness Audit on your stack — tell me what surprised you. What did you cancel? Two-line replies are fine. I read every one.
Talk next week,
Emre
Founder, ToolChase
P.P.S. Forwarded this email? Subscribe here →